Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2014-02-01 12:24:01
Size: 784
Editor: DirkBaechle
Comment: added success stories page
Revision 2 as of 2014-02-01 17:06:06
Size: 783
Editor: DirkBaechle
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 16: Line 16:
It has a well-thought design, offering a lot of functionality and support for complicated builds. It's easy to extend by adding custom Builders and Tools. And it's a lot of fun to hack it's core sources. `;)` It has a well-thought design, offering a lot of functionality and support for complicated builds. It's easy to extend by adding custom Builders and Tools. And it's a lot of fun to hack its core sources. `;)`

Success stories

We/I use SCons for...

In the company I worked before, it helped me a lot with providing Linux releases for all our main tools. Being the only Unix/Linux guy and keeping up with 7 Windows/VisualStudio developers was not an easy task. The final SCons setup was able to update the sources from SVN and compile/link them automatically (mixed C/C++/Fortran), being very robust against changes like added or removed files for example.


...

We/I like SCons because...

It has a well-thought design, offering a lot of functionality and support for complicated builds. It's easy to extend by adding custom Builders and Tools. And it's a lot of fun to hack its core sources. ;)


...

SuccessStories (last edited 2014-02-01 17:06:06 by DirkBaechle)