1 17:18:54 *	garyo-home (n=chatzill@209.6.158.38) has joined #scons
   2 17:22:57 *	stevenknight (n=stevenkn@67.218.103.44) has joined #scons
   3 17:24:27 <stevenknight>	hey all
   4 17:25:42 <garyo-home>	Hi, Steven.
   5 17:25:50 <garyo-home>	Hi, Greg (?)
   6 17:26:00 <garyo-home>	Anyone else here yet?
   7 17:26:15 <stevenknight>	just got here myself
   8 17:26:23 <stevenknight>	haven't seen anyone else
   9 17:26:39 <garyo-home>	Looks like the bug list should be pretty short this time.
  10 17:26:49 <stevenknight>	yep
  11 17:37:21 <garyo-home>	Anyway... where's Greg?
  12 17:39:12 <stevenknight>	well, Greg entered his comments, shall we dive in and do what we can?
  13 17:39:24 <garyo-home>	Yes, I was just thinking that.
  14 17:39:46 <garyo-home>	2279: how about I integrate it, and we give Arve commit rights on his next patch?
  15 17:40:13 <garyo-home>	Unless you have swig.
  16 17:40:09 <stevenknight>	sounds good -- or actually,
  17 17:40:23 <stevenknight>	i may have been thinking about someone different for commit rights
  18 17:40:35 <stevenknight>	IIRC Greg's been talking with Ben Webb about becoming the SWIG guru
  19 17:40:49 <stevenknight>	I do have swig installed so could do at least a sanity check on it
  20 17:41:02 <garyo-home>	Oh, right.  Maybe we should let Ben check it then.
  21 17:41:15 <stevenknight>	okay, i'll follow up w/Greg and/or Ben
  22 17:41:28 <stevenknight>	and integrate it myself if neither of them has cycles
  23 17:41:25 <garyo-home>	good.
  24 17:41:30 <stevenknight>	done
  25 17:41:43 <garyo-home>	2281: I think you're right, error if no action.
  26 17:42:04 <stevenknight>	okay, 2.0 p3... me?
  27 17:42:10 <stevenknight>	since i spoke up...
  28 17:42:12 <garyo-home>	yes.
  29 17:42:33 <stevenknight>	2281:  2.0, p3, sk
  30 17:42:33 <stevenknight>	done
  31 17:43:00 <stevenknight>	2282:  1.3, p3, who?
  32 17:43:12 <garyo-home>	right, who.  I can do it, or maybe Greg would.
  33 17:43:31 <garyo-home>	Heck, count me in, I've done a bunch of doc already.
  34 17:43:39 <stevenknight>	okay
  35 17:43:43 <stevenknight>	2282:  1.3, p3, garyo
  36 17:43:44 <stevenknight>	done
  37 17:43:45 <stevenknight>	thanks
  38 17:44:04 <stevenknight>	2283:
  39 17:44:11 <garyo-home>	2283: we need to actually see the patch before we can do anything.
  40 17:44:15 <stevenknight>	do you see any significant downside to going with it?
  41 17:44:23 <stevenknight>	i looked and it seemed pretty reasonable to me
  42 17:44:38 <garyo-home>	Good -- no, as long as it doesn't break anything, why not.
  43 17:44:52 <stevenknight>	i wasn't sure what Greg's concerns are w.r.t. "special-case cross-compiling"
  44 17:45:15 <garyo-home>	I think he wants to specify cross-compilation at a toolchain level in a nice way.
  45 17:45:34 <stevenknight>	i see
  46 17:45:07 <stevenknight>	2.x p3 seem reasonable?
  47 17:45:13 <stevenknight>	right now those don't need to be assigned
  48 17:45:29 <stevenknight>	and we're going to have to have a big assignment party some time post 1.3 for those
  49 17:45:38 <garyo-home>	Yes, 2.x for all feature requests is good.
  50 17:45:42 <stevenknight>	not just as an implementation within a specific tool, right
  51 17:45:47 <garyo-home>	right.
  52 17:45:48 <stevenknight>	okay
  53 17:45:54 <stevenknight>	2283:  2.x, p3, TBD
  54 17:45:57 <stevenknight>	done
  55 17:46:16 <stevenknight>	2284:
  56 17:46:22 <garyo-home>	as you say, it's a dup.
  57 17:46:24 <stevenknight>	I'll DUP to 1914
  58 17:46:29 <garyo-home>	good!
  59 17:46:34 <stevenknight>	cool, done with the current issues
  60 17:46:35 <garyo-home>	that was quick.
  61 17:46:39 <stevenknight>	nice
  62 17:47:10 <garyo-home>	I spent some time on the 2005Q2 issues too.
  63 17:47:25 <stevenknight>	excellent, let's see if we can get through those
  64 17:47:40 <garyo-home>	1140: close as WORKSFORME.
  65 17:47:48 <stevenknight>	1140:  done
  66 17:47:50 <garyo-home>	1185: consensus WORKSFORME.
  67 17:48:08 <stevenknight>	1185:  done
  68 17:48:21 <stevenknight>	1187:  research, sk
  69 17:48:25 <garyo-home>	yup.
  70 17:48:42 <stevenknight>	1188:  research, sk
  71 17:48:47 <stevenknight>	close if confirm fix
  72 17:49:03 <garyo-home>	I actually tried 1188 and it worked.  ?
  73 17:49:11 <garyo-home>	But I had to make my own testcase.
  74 17:49:17 <stevenknight>	do you still have it?
  75 17:49:46 <garyo-home>	Maybe.  It was just foo.c conditionally including foo.h, iirc.
  76 17:50:11 <stevenknight>	with appropriate case change in the extension, i take it
  77 17:50:31 <garyo-home>	case change?
  78 17:50:34 <stevenknight>	you have to get it stored in the .sconsign file and then run again
  79 17:50:47 <stevenknight>	d'oh!  scratch my case change comment
  80 17:50:52 <stevenknight>	thinking about the next issue
  81 17:50:55 <garyo-home>	:-)
  82 17:51:02 <garyo-home>	Anyway, whatever you find there is OK.
  83 17:51:22 <stevenknight>	if you still have the test case handy, send it my way or attach it as a starting point
  84 17:51:30 <garyo-home>	Either close or post testcase and retriage.  I'll see if I have the testcase.
  85 17:51:49 <stevenknight>	even if it's already fixed, i'd feel better checking in a test to make sure it stays fixed
  86 17:52:07 <garyo-home>	Good point.
  87 17:52:22 <stevenknight>	1188:  research, sk, garyo to see if he has his test case
  88 17:52:23 <stevenknight>	done
  89 17:52:29 <stevenknight>	1193:
  90 17:52:40 <stevenknight>	1193:  1.3, p2, sk
  91 17:52:41 <garyo-home>	1193, p3 sk?
  92 17:52:46 <garyo-home>	yes
  93 17:52:52 <stevenknight>	done
  94 17:53:04 <garyo-home>	1194 you already closed.
  95 17:53:05 <stevenknight>	1194:  already fixed
  96 17:53:28 <stevenknight>	1198:  
  97 17:53:40 <garyo-home>	1198: do you really have to set PYTHONPATH if you install as non-root?
  98 17:53:50 <stevenknight>	not sure about that
  99 17:53:59 <stevenknight>	but maybe i'm misunderstanding the bug
 100 17:53:59 <garyo-home>	I don't think so, I do that on one of my Linux boxes where I don't have root and I don't think I set PYTHONPATH.
 101 17:54:14 <stevenknight>	i don't set it either
 102 17:54:29 <stevenknight>	but it sounds like the underlying problem is we don't do the right thing with installing the man page
 103 17:55:03 <garyo-home>	Right, forgot about that part.  Should be a separate issue IMHO, but anyway.
 104 17:55:20 <stevenknight>	ah, okay
 105 17:55:23 <garyo-home>	He wants us to install the man pages anyway.  That's reasonable.
 106 17:55:46 <stevenknight>	should I just re-title this issue, or open up a separate one?
 107 17:56:10 <garyo-home>	I'd close this one w/ explanation, and open a new one with a reference to this old one.
 108 17:56:17 <stevenknight>	okay, i'll do that
 109 17:56:22 <garyo-home>	great.
 110 17:56:36 <garyo-home>	That's that!
 111 17:56:41 <stevenknight>	1198:  open new issue, 2.0, p3 ?
 112 17:56:49 <stevenknight>	done
 113 17:56:51 <stevenknight>	excellent
 114 17:57:06 <stevenknight>	we're actually beginning to get this "consensus" thing down...  :-)
 115 17:57:15 <garyo-home>	Yes, it works well.
 116 17:58:04 <garyo-home>	There's probably a lot of scheduling discussions we could have right now, but I am pretty burned out and would like to go to bed.
 117 17:57:59 <stevenknight>	looks like you haven't had a chance to tackle 2005q1, shall we just push that off to next time?
 118 17:58:07 <stevenknight>	and go get other things done... :-)
 119 17:58:13 <garyo-home>	Yes, and let's do 2005q1 next time.
 120 17:58:14 <stevenknight>	okay, sounds good
 121 17:58:37 <stevenknight>	i'm going to try to get sgk_batch integrated into trunk and then kick out a checkpoint so it gets air time
 122 17:58:43 <stevenknight>	and then tackle integrating vs_revamp
 123 17:58:57 <stevenknight>	with another checkpoint for that
 124 17:58:56 <garyo-home>	+1 on both of those.  I will test them hard!
 125 17:59:22 <garyo-home>	I'll be able to test on my home Windows box once vs_revamp is out (I have VS2008 here)
 126 17:59:30 <stevenknight>	cool
 127 18:00:03 <stevenknight>	we've been working on a signfiicant refactoring of .vcproj / .sln generation
 128 18:00:34 <garyo-home>	OK, not my particular cup o' tea but some people like it.
 129 18:00:37 <stevenknight>	still a ways off, so not for 1.3, but I think it'll come with some good stuff for hard-core Windows developers
 130 18:00:41 <stevenknight>	yep
 131 18:01:25 <garyo-home>	OK Steven, see you later.
 132 18:01:39 <stevenknight>	garyo-home:  good night, thanks again
 133 18:18:03 *	stevenknight has quit ("Leaving")
 134 18:33:38 *	garyo-home has quit ("ChatZilla 0.9.84 [Firefox 3.0.5/2008120122]")
 135 

BugParty/IrcLog2009-01-07 (last edited 2009-01-08 02:02:56 by GaryOberbrunner)